# Dozzle vs OpenReader

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Dozzle | OpenReader |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 13 in Log Management | #4 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 14 754 ✓ | 550 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +280 ✓ | +34 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 43 ✓ | 19 |
| Latest release | v11.3.5 · 24 Oct 2026 | v5.4.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Dozzle scores 77/100 against 59/100 for OpenReader, so it is the safer default.

Dozzle ships more often: 43 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for OpenReader.

If you want the quickest setup, Dozzle is easier to run; OpenReader needs more configuration.

Dozzle is growing faster right now (+280 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Dozzle](https://selfhost.directory/project/dozzle) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/dozzle.md)
- [OpenReader](https://selfhost.directory/project/openreader) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openreader.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/dozzle-vs-openreader