# double-take vs Rembg

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | double-take | Rembg |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 78/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 2 in Computer Vision | #1 of 13 in Image Processing |
| GitHub stars | 701 | 25 217 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +78 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v2.0.86 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Rembg scores 78/100 against 51/100 for double-take, so it is the safer default.

Rembg ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for double-take.

If you want the quickest setup, Rembg is easier to run; double-take needs more configuration.

Rembg is growing faster right now (+78 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [double-take](https://selfhost.directory/project/double-take) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/double-take.md)
- [Rembg](https://selfhost.directory/project/rembg) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rembg.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/double-take-vs-rembg