double-takevsLLM Vision
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| double-take | LLM Vision | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 2 in Computer Vision | #19 of 104 in Home Automation |
| GitHub stars | 701 | 1 516 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +39 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 4 |
| Latest release | — | v1.7.2 · 3 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
LLM Vision scores 63/100 against 51/100 for double-take, so it is the safer default.
LLM Vision ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for double-take.
LLM Vision is growing faster right now (+39 stars in 30 days).
double-take details →LLM Vision details →
Swap a project
Keep double-take, compare it with
Keep LLM Vision, compare it with