# Donetick vs Tube Archivist

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Donetick | Tube Archivist |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 72/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #6 of 34 in Task Management | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 2 687 | 8 552 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +103 ✓ | +83 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 6 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.1.83 · 18 Oct 2026 | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Tube Archivist scores 72/100 against 63/100 for Donetick, so it is the safer default.

Tube Archivist ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Donetick.

If you want the quickest setup, Donetick is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Donetick](https://selfhost.directory/project/donetick) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/donetick.md)
- [Tube Archivist](https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/donetick-vs-tube-archivist