# dokploy vs UglyFeed

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | dokploy | UglyFeed |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 14 in Platform as a Service | #52 of 85 in Feed Reader |
| GitHub stars | 38 110 ✓ | 323 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +613 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 27 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v0.30.10 · 22 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.0.52 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

dokploy scores 80/100 against 44/100 for UglyFeed, so it is the safer default.

dokploy ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for UglyFeed.

If you want the quickest setup, dokploy is easier to run; UglyFeed needs more configuration.

dokploy is growing faster right now (+613 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [dokploy](https://selfhost.directory/project/dokploy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/dokploy.md)
- [UglyFeed](https://selfhost.directory/project/uglyfeed) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uglyfeed.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Appwrite vs dokploy](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-dokploy)
- [coolify vs dokploy](https://selfhost.directory/compare/coolify-vs-dokploy)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/dokploy-vs-uglyfeed