# dokploy vs TradingAgents

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | dokploy | TradingAgents |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 14 in Platform as a Service | #4 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 38 094 | 117 750 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +608 | +5 391 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 27 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | v0.30.10 · 22 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

TradingAgents scores 86/100 against 80/100 for dokploy, so it is the safer default.

dokploy ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.

If you want the quickest setup, dokploy is easier to run; TradingAgents needs more configuration.

TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 391 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [dokploy](https://selfhost.directory/project/dokploy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/dokploy.md)
- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Appwrite vs dokploy](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-dokploy)
- [coolify vs dokploy](https://selfhost.directory/compare/coolify-vs-dokploy)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/dokploy-vs-tradingagents