# dokploy vs Stirling-PDF

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | dokploy | Stirling-PDF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 14 in Platform as a Service | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 38 094 | 95 252 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +608 | +2 339 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 27 ✓ | 25 |
| Latest release | v0.30.10 · 22 Oct 2026 | v3.2.2 · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Stirling-PDF scores 87/100 against 80/100 for dokploy, so it is the safer default.

dokploy ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 25 for Stirling-PDF.

If you want the quickest setup, dokploy is easier to run; Stirling-PDF needs more configuration.

Stirling-PDF is growing faster right now (+2 339 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [dokploy](https://selfhost.directory/project/dokploy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/dokploy.md)
- [Stirling-PDF](https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Appwrite vs dokploy](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-dokploy)
- [coolify vs dokploy](https://selfhost.directory/compare/coolify-vs-dokploy)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/dokploy-vs-stirling-pdf