# dokploy vs RustFS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | dokploy | RustFS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 74/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 14 in Platform as a Service | #1 of 5 in Storage |
| GitHub stars | 38 097 ✓ | 35 503 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +611 | +1 771 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 27 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | v0.30.10 · 22 Oct 2026 | 1.0.4 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

dokploy scores 80/100 against 74/100 for RustFS, so it is the safer default.

dokploy ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for RustFS.

If you want the quickest setup, dokploy is easier to run; RustFS needs more configuration.

RustFS is growing faster right now (+1 771 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [dokploy](https://selfhost.directory/project/dokploy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/dokploy.md)
- [RustFS](https://selfhost.directory/project/rustfs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rustfs.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Appwrite vs dokploy](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-dokploy)
- [coolify vs dokploy](https://selfhost.directory/compare/coolify-vs-dokploy)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/dokploy-vs-rustfs