# dokploy vs Reactive Resume

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | dokploy | Reactive Resume |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 14 in Platform as a Service | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 38 094 | 44 998 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +608 | +1 625 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 27 | 34 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.30.10 · 22 Oct 2026 | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 80/100 for dokploy, so it is the safer default.

Reactive Resume ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 27 for dokploy.

If you want the quickest setup, dokploy is easier to run; Reactive Resume needs more configuration.

Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 625 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [dokploy](https://selfhost.directory/project/dokploy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/dokploy.md)
- [Reactive Resume](https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Appwrite vs dokploy](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-dokploy)
- [coolify vs dokploy](https://selfhost.directory/compare/coolify-vs-dokploy)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/dokploy-vs-reactive-resume