# dokploy vs namer

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | dokploy | namer |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 14 in Platform as a Service | #19 of 34 in File Management |
| GitHub stars | 38 097 ✓ | 332 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +611 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 27 ✓ | 4 |
| Latest release | v0.30.10 · 22 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.19.20 · 25 May 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

dokploy scores 80/100 against 49/100 for namer, so it is the safer default.

dokploy ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for namer.

If you want the quickest setup, dokploy is easier to run; namer needs more configuration.

dokploy is growing faster right now (+611 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [dokploy](https://selfhost.directory/project/dokploy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/dokploy.md)
- [namer](https://selfhost.directory/project/namer) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/namer.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Appwrite vs dokploy](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-dokploy)
- [coolify vs dokploy](https://selfhost.directory/compare/coolify-vs-dokploy)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/dokploy-vs-namer