# dokploy vs llama.cpp

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | dokploy | llama.cpp |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 93/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 14 in Platform as a Service | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | 38 096 | 132 669 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +610 | +3 312 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 27 | 1461 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.30.10 · 22 Oct 2026 | b11972 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | C++ |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 80/100 for dokploy, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1461 stable releases in the past year, against 27 for dokploy.

If you want the quickest setup, dokploy is easier to run; llama.cpp needs more configuration.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 312 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [dokploy](https://selfhost.directory/project/dokploy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/dokploy.md)
- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Appwrite vs dokploy](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-dokploy)
- [coolify vs dokploy](https://selfhost.directory/compare/coolify-vs-dokploy)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/dokploy-vs-llamacpp