# dokploy vs hass-configurator

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | dokploy | hass-configurator |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 14 in Platform as a Service | #6 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 38 111 ✓ | 339 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +614 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 27 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | v0.30.10 · 22 Oct 2026 ✓ | 0.7.0 · 18 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

dokploy scores 80/100 against 50/100 for hass-configurator, so it is the safer default.

dokploy ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for hass-configurator.

If you want the quickest setup, dokploy is easier to run; hass-configurator needs more configuration.

dokploy is growing faster right now (+614 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [dokploy](https://selfhost.directory/project/dokploy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/dokploy.md)
- [hass-configurator](https://selfhost.directory/project/hass-configurator) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hass-configurator.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Appwrite vs dokploy](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-dokploy)
- [coolify vs dokploy](https://selfhost.directory/compare/coolify-vs-dokploy)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/dokploy-vs-hass-configurator