# dokploy vs firebolt-core

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | dokploy | firebolt-core |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 14 in Platform as a Service | #32 of 38 in Databases |
| GitHub stars | 38 103 ✓ | 256 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +606 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 27 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | v0.30.10 · 22 Oct 2026 ✓ | v4.31.13-0.20260424104720.5698ca5339fc · 24 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

dokploy scores 80/100 against 44/100 for firebolt-core, so it is the safer default.

dokploy ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for firebolt-core.

If you want the quickest setup, dokploy is easier to run; firebolt-core needs more configuration.

dokploy is growing faster right now (+606 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [dokploy](https://selfhost.directory/project/dokploy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/dokploy.md)
- [firebolt-core](https://selfhost.directory/project/firebolt-core) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/firebolt-core.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Appwrite vs dokploy](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-dokploy)
- [coolify vs dokploy](https://selfhost.directory/compare/coolify-vs-dokploy)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/dokploy-vs-firebolt-core