# dokku vs Urbit

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | dokku | Urbit |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 14 in Platform as a Service | #3 of 8 in Operating System |
| GitHub stars | 32 205 ✓ | 3 622 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +51 ✓ | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | v0.38.32 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | hoon |

## Which one should you pick?

dokku scores 77/100 against 63/100 for Urbit, so it is the safer default.

dokku ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Urbit.

If you want the quickest setup, dokku is easier to run; Urbit needs more configuration.

dokku is growing faster right now (+51 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [dokku](https://selfhost.directory/project/dokku) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/dokku.md)
- [Urbit](https://selfhost.directory/project/urbit) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/urbit.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/dokku-vs-urbit