# Docling Studio vs Typst

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Docling Studio | Typst |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 82/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #7 of 12 in Document Processing | #1 of 2 in Publishing |
| GitHub stars | 268 | 56 871 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +142 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | v0.6.1 · 22 Sept 2026 ✓ | v0.15.1 · 17 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

Typst scores 82/100 against 51/100 for Docling Studio, so it is the safer default.

Docling Studio ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Typst.

If you want the quickest setup, Typst is easier to run; Docling Studio needs more configuration.

Typst is growing faster right now (+142 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Docling Studio](https://selfhost.directory/project/docling-studio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/docling-studio.md)
- [Typst](https://selfhost.directory/project/typst) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/typst.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/docling-studio-vs-typst