# dockhand vs World Monitor

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | dockhand | World Monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 44 in Container Management | #5 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 6 909 | 89 708 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +549 | +2 419 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 31 ✓ | 17 |
| Latest release | v1.0.55 · 23 Oct 2026 | v2.11.6 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

World Monitor scores 86/100 against 72/100 for dockhand, so it is the safer default.

dockhand ships more often: 31 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for World Monitor.

If you want the quickest setup, dockhand is easier to run; World Monitor needs more configuration.

World Monitor is growing faster right now (+2 419 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [dockhand](https://selfhost.directory/project/dockhand) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/dockhand.md)
- [World Monitor](https://selfhost.directory/project/world-monitor) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/world-monitor.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/dockhand-vs-world-monitor