dockhandvsWindows ARM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| dockhand | Windows ARM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 44 in Container Management | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 6 912 | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +552 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 31 | 10 |
| Latest release | v1.0.55 · 23 Oct 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Batchfile |
Which one should you pick?
dockhand scores 72/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.
dockhand ships more often: 31 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Windows ARM.
If you want the quickest setup, dockhand is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.
dockhand is growing faster right now (+552 stars in 30 days).
dockhand details →Windows ARM details →
Swap a project
Keep dockhand, compare it with
Keep Windows ARM, compare it with