# dockhand vs Urbit

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | dockhand | Urbit |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 ✓ | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 44 in Container Management | #3 of 8 in Operating System |
| GitHub stars | 6 912 ✓ | 3 622 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +552 ✓ | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 31 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | v1.0.55 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | hoon |

## Which one should you pick?

dockhand scores 72/100 against 63/100 for Urbit, so it is the safer default.

dockhand ships more often: 31 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Urbit.

If you want the quickest setup, dockhand is easier to run; Urbit needs more configuration.

dockhand is growing faster right now (+552 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [dockhand](https://selfhost.directory/project/dockhand) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/dockhand.md)
- [Urbit](https://selfhost.directory/project/urbit) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/urbit.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/dockhand-vs-urbit