# dockhand vs temporal

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | dockhand | temporal |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 83/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 44 in Container Management | #1 of 1 in Workflow |
| GitHub stars | 6 916 | 24 044 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +556 | +784 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 31 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | v1.0.55 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

temporal scores 83/100 against 72/100 for dockhand, so it is the safer default.

dockhand ships more often: 31 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for temporal.

If you want the quickest setup, dockhand is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.

## Details

- [dockhand](https://selfhost.directory/project/dockhand) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/dockhand.md)
- [temporal](https://selfhost.directory/project/temporal) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/temporal.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/dockhand-vs-temporal