# dockhand vs Stirling-PDF

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | dockhand | Stirling-PDF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 44 in Container Management | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 6 916 | 95 260 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +556 | +2 347 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 31 ✓ | 25 |
| Latest release | v1.0.55 · 23 Oct 2026 | v3.2.2 · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Stirling-PDF scores 87/100 against 72/100 for dockhand, so it is the safer default.

dockhand ships more often: 31 stable releases in the past year, against 25 for Stirling-PDF.

If you want the quickest setup, dockhand is easier to run; Stirling-PDF needs more configuration.

Stirling-PDF is growing faster right now (+2 347 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [dockhand](https://selfhost.directory/project/dockhand) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/dockhand.md)
- [Stirling-PDF](https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/dockhand-vs-stirling-pdf