# dockhand vs SpacetimeDB

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | dockhand | SpacetimeDB |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 75/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 44 in Container Management | #7 of 38 in Databases |
| GitHub stars | 6 925 | 25 418 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +504 ✓ | +96 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 31 ✓ | 7 |
| Latest release | v1.0.55 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.13.0 · 19 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

SpacetimeDB scores 75/100 against 73/100 for dockhand, so it is the safer default.

dockhand ships more often: 31 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for SpacetimeDB.

If you want the quickest setup, dockhand is easier to run; SpacetimeDB needs more configuration.

dockhand is growing faster right now (+504 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [dockhand](https://selfhost.directory/project/dockhand) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/dockhand.md)
- [SpacetimeDB](https://selfhost.directory/project/spacetimedb) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/spacetimedb.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/dockhand-vs-spacetimedb