# dockhand vs Scada-LTS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | dockhand | Scada-LTS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 44 in Container Management | #2 of 4 in Industrial IoT |
| GitHub stars | 6 920 ✓ | 1 019 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +499 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 31 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.0.55 · 23 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

dockhand scores 73/100 against 55/100 for Scada-LTS, so it is the safer default.

dockhand ships more often: 31 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Scada-LTS.

If you want the quickest setup, dockhand is easier to run; Scada-LTS needs more configuration.

dockhand is growing faster right now (+499 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [dockhand](https://selfhost.directory/project/dockhand) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/dockhand.md)
- [Scada-LTS](https://selfhost.directory/project/scada-lts) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/scada-lts.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/dockhand-vs-scada-lts