dockhandvsScada-LTS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| dockhand | Scada-LTS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 44 in Container Management | #2 of 4 in Industrial IoT |
| GitHub stars | 6 920 | 1 019 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +499 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 31 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.0.55 · 23 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Java |
Which one should you pick?
dockhand scores 73/100 against 55/100 for Scada-LTS, so it is the safer default.
dockhand ships more often: 31 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Scada-LTS.
If you want the quickest setup, dockhand is easier to run; Scada-LTS needs more configuration.
dockhand is growing faster right now (+499 stars in 30 days).
dockhand details →Scada-LTS details →
Swap a project
Keep dockhand, compare it with
Keep Scada-LTS, compare it with