# dockhand vs mitmproxy

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | dockhand | mitmproxy |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 44 in Container Management | #1 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 6 920 | 46 468 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +499 | +1 324 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 31 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | v1.0.55 · 23 Oct 2026 | v12.3.1 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

mitmproxy scores 86/100 against 73/100 for dockhand, so it is the safer default.

dockhand ships more often: 31 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for mitmproxy.

If you want the quickest setup, dockhand is easier to run; mitmproxy needs more configuration.

mitmproxy is growing faster right now (+1 324 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [dockhand](https://selfhost.directory/project/dockhand) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/dockhand.md)
- [mitmproxy](https://selfhost.directory/project/mitmproxy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mitmproxy.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/dockhand-vs-mitmproxy