# dockhand vs illa-builder

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | dockhand | illa-builder |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 ✓ | 67/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 44 in Container Management | #3 of 17 in Low Code |
| GitHub stars | 6 912 | 12 337 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +552 ✓ | +15 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 31 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.0.55 · 23 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

dockhand scores 72/100 against 67/100 for illa-builder, so it is the safer default.

dockhand ships more often: 31 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for illa-builder.

If you want the quickest setup, dockhand is easier to run; illa-builder needs more configuration.

dockhand is growing faster right now (+552 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [dockhand](https://selfhost.directory/project/dockhand) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/dockhand.md)
- [illa-builder](https://selfhost.directory/project/illa-builder) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/illa-builder.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/dockhand-vs-illa-builder