# dockhand vs globalping-probe

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | dockhand | globalping-probe |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 ✓ | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 44 in Container Management | #29 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 6 916 ✓ | 215 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +556 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 31 ✓ | 19 |
| Latest release | v1.0.55 · 23 Oct 2026 | v0.54.0 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | ISC |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

dockhand scores 72/100 against 48/100 for globalping-probe, so it is the safer default.

dockhand ships more often: 31 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for globalping-probe.

dockhand is growing faster right now (+556 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [dockhand](https://selfhost.directory/project/dockhand) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/dockhand.md)
- [globalping-probe](https://selfhost.directory/project/globalping-probe) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/globalping-probe.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/dockhand-vs-globalping-probe