# dockge vs Tube Archivist

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | dockge | Tube Archivist |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 5 in Docker Management | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 24 708 ✓ | 8 553 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +269 ✓ | +84 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 6 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

dockge scores 76/100 against 72/100 for Tube Archivist, so it is the safer default.

Tube Archivist ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for dockge.

If you want the quickest setup, dockge is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.

dockge is growing faster right now (+269 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [dockge](https://selfhost.directory/project/dockge) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/dockge.md)
- [Tube Archivist](https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/dockge-vs-tube-archivist