DockerRegistryvsWinter CMS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| DockerRegistry | Winter CMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Container Registry | #16 of 42 in Content Management |
| GitHub stars | 10 667 | 1 522 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +45 | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 7 |
| Latest release | v3.1.2 · 24 Sept 2026 | v1.2.14 · 19 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
DockerRegistry scores 74/100 against 62/100 for Winter CMS, so it is the safer default.
Winter CMS ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for DockerRegistry.
If you want the quickest setup, DockerRegistry is easier to run; Winter CMS needs more configuration.
DockerRegistry is growing faster right now (+45 stars in 30 days).
DockerRegistry details →Winter CMS details →
Swap a project
Keep DockerRegistry, compare it with
Keep Winter CMS, compare it with