# DockerRegistry vs qm-music

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | DockerRegistry | qm-music |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 ✓ | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Container Registry | #20 of 59 in Music Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 10 667 ✓ | 588 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +45 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | v3.1.2 · 24 Sept 2026 ✓ | v2.5.0 · 10 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

DockerRegistry scores 74/100 against 51/100 for qm-music, so it is the safer default.

qm-music ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for DockerRegistry.

DockerRegistry is growing faster right now (+45 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [DockerRegistry](https://selfhost.directory/project/dockerregistry) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/dockerregistry.md)
- [qm-music](https://selfhost.directory/project/qm-music) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qm-music.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/dockerregistry-vs-qm-music