# DockerRegistry vs OpenFan Controller

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | DockerRegistry | OpenFan Controller |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 ✓ | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Container Registry | #63 of 104 in Home Automation |
| GitHub stars | 10 667 ✓ | 321 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +45 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 3 |
| Latest release | v3.1.2 · 24 Sept 2026 | 2026-10-09 · 9 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | CSS |

## Which one should you pick?

DockerRegistry scores 74/100 against 50/100 for OpenFan Controller, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, DockerRegistry is easier to run; OpenFan Controller needs more configuration.

DockerRegistry is growing faster right now (+45 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [DockerRegistry](https://selfhost.directory/project/dockerregistry) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/dockerregistry.md)
- [OpenFan Controller](https://selfhost.directory/project/openfan-controller) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openfan-controller.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/dockerregistry-vs-openfan-controller