# DockerRegistry vs open·kritt

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | DockerRegistry | open·kritt |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 ✓ | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Container Registry | #24 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 10 667 ✓ | 2 380 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +45 ✓ | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 5 ✓ |
| Latest release | v3.1.2 · 24 Sept 2026 ✓ | v1.4.1 · 16 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

DockerRegistry scores 74/100 against 62/100 for open·kritt, so it is the safer default.

open·kritt ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for DockerRegistry.

If you want the quickest setup, DockerRegistry is easier to run; open·kritt needs more configuration.

DockerRegistry is growing faster right now (+45 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [DockerRegistry](https://selfhost.directory/project/dockerregistry) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/dockerregistry.md)
- [open·kritt](https://selfhost.directory/project/open-kritt) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/open-kritt.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/dockerregistry-vs-open-kritt