DockerRegistryvsHiClaw
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| DockerRegistry | HiClaw | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 67/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Container Registry | #32 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 10 667 | 5 886 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +44 | +223 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 15 |
| Latest release | v3.1.2 · 24 Sept 2026 | v1.2.5 · 16 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
DockerRegistry scores 74/100 against 67/100 for HiClaw, so it is the safer default.
HiClaw ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for DockerRegistry.
HiClaw is growing faster right now (+223 stars in 30 days).
DockerRegistry details →HiClaw details →
Swap a project
Keep DockerRegistry, compare it with
Keep HiClaw, compare it with