DockerRegistryvsgrowthbook
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| DockerRegistry | growthbook | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Container Registry | #3 of 8 in Feature Flags |
| GitHub stars | 10 667 | 8 547 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +45 | +122 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 6 |
| Latest release | v3.1.2 · 24 Sept 2026 | v5.1.0 · 22 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
DockerRegistry scores 74/100 against 71/100 for growthbook, so it is the safer default.
growthbook ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for DockerRegistry.
If you want the quickest setup, DockerRegistry is easier to run; growthbook needs more configuration.
growthbook is growing faster right now (+122 stars in 30 days).
DockerRegistry details →growthbook details →
Swap a project
Keep DockerRegistry, compare it with
Keep growthbook, compare it with