docker-unmsvsPi-hole
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| docker-unms | Pi-hole | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 45/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #24 of 34 in Network Management | #1 of 41 in DNS |
| GitHub stars | 278 | 61 541 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +497 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 6 |
| Latest release | 3.1.69 · 22 Oct 2026 | v6.5 · 17 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | — | Other |
| Main language | Dockerfile | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
Pi-hole scores 87/100 against 45/100 for docker-unms, so it is the safer default.
Pi-hole ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for docker-unms.
If you want the quickest setup, docker-unms is easier to run; Pi-hole needs more configuration.
Pi-hole is growing faster right now (+497 stars in 30 days).
docker-unms details →Pi-hole details →
Swap a project
Keep docker-unms, compare it with
Keep Pi-hole, compare it with