# docker-pi-hole vs Zigbee2MQTT

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | docker-pi-hole | Zigbee2MQTT |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 41 in DNS | #5 of 104 in Home Automation |
| GitHub stars | 11 728 | 15 762 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +113 ✓ | +98 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 15 ✓ |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 17 Oct 2026 ✓ | 2.14.2 · 1 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

docker-pi-hole scores 77/100 against 76/100 for Zigbee2MQTT, so it is the safer default.

Zigbee2MQTT ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for docker-pi-hole.

If you want the quickest setup, docker-pi-hole is easier to run; Zigbee2MQTT needs more configuration.

## Details

- [docker-pi-hole](https://selfhost.directory/project/docker-pi-hole) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/docker-pi-hole.md)
- [Zigbee2MQTT](https://selfhost.directory/project/zigbee2mqtt) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zigbee2mqtt.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/docker-pi-hole-vs-zigbee2mqtt