# docker-pi-hole vs Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | docker-pi-hole | Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 41 in DNS | #4 of 11 in Container Orchestration |
| GitHub stars | 11 727 ✓ | 1 725 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +114 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | 4.4.4 · 20 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Shell | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

docker-pi-hole scores 77/100 against 64/100 for Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes, so it is the safer default.

docker-pi-hole ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes.

If you want the quickest setup, docker-pi-hole is easier to run; Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes needs more configuration.

docker-pi-hole is growing faster right now (+114 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [docker-pi-hole](https://selfhost.directory/project/docker-pi-hole) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/docker-pi-hole.md)
- [Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes](https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-to-jupyterhub-k8s) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-to-jupyterhub-k8s.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/docker-pi-hole-vs-zero-to-jupyterhub-k8s