docker-pi-holevsZammad
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| docker-pi-hole | Zammad | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 41 in DNS | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 11 728 | 6 050 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +115 | +103 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 0 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
docker-pi-hole scores 77/100 against 70/100 for Zammad, so it is the safer default.
docker-pi-hole ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zammad.
If you want the quickest setup, docker-pi-hole is easier to run; Zammad needs more configuration.
docker-pi-hole details →Zammad details →
Swap a project
Keep docker-pi-hole, compare it with
Keep Zammad, compare it with