# docker-pi-hole vs wyoming-piper

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | docker-pi-hole | wyoming-piper |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 41 in DNS | #7 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 11 728 ✓ | 218 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +113 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 15 ✓ |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 17 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.5.2 · 11 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Shell | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

docker-pi-hole scores 77/100 against 52/100 for wyoming-piper, so it is the safer default.

wyoming-piper ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for docker-pi-hole.

If you want the quickest setup, docker-pi-hole is easier to run; wyoming-piper needs more configuration.

docker-pi-hole is growing faster right now (+113 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [docker-pi-hole](https://selfhost.directory/project/docker-pi-hole) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/docker-pi-hole.md)
- [wyoming-piper](https://selfhost.directory/project/wyoming-piper) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wyoming-piper.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/docker-pi-hole-vs-wyoming-piper