docker-pi-holevswraft
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| docker-pi-hole | wraft | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 41 in DNS | #35 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 11 728 | 167 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +113 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 3 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | v0.6.7 · 25 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Elixir |
Which one should you pick?
docker-pi-hole scores 77/100 against 44/100 for wraft, so it is the safer default.
docker-pi-hole ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for wraft.
If you want the quickest setup, docker-pi-hole is easier to run; wraft needs more configuration.
docker-pi-hole is growing faster right now (+113 stars in 30 days).
docker-pi-hole details →wraft details →
Swap a project
Keep docker-pi-hole, compare it with
Keep wraft, compare it with