# docker-pi-hole vs Workout.cool

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | docker-pi-hole | Workout.cool |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 41 in DNS | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 11 725 ✓ | 8 650 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +112 | +155 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 17 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Shell | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

docker-pi-hole scores 77/100 against 66/100 for Workout.cool, so it is the safer default.

docker-pi-hole ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Workout.cool.

## Details

- [docker-pi-hole](https://selfhost.directory/project/docker-pi-hole) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/docker-pi-hole.md)
- [Workout.cool](https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/docker-pi-hole-vs-workout-cool