# docker-pi-hole vs WireGuard Easy

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | docker-pi-hole | WireGuard Easy |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 41 in DNS | #7 of 56 in VPN |
| GitHub stars | 11 728 | 27 320 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +115 | +332 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | v15.5.0 · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

docker-pi-hole scores 77/100 against 73/100 for WireGuard Easy, so it is the safer default.

docker-pi-hole ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for WireGuard Easy.

If you want the quickest setup, docker-pi-hole is easier to run; WireGuard Easy needs more configuration.

WireGuard Easy is growing faster right now (+332 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [docker-pi-hole](https://selfhost.directory/project/docker-pi-hole) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/docker-pi-hole.md)
- [WireGuard Easy](https://selfhost.directory/project/wireguard-easy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wireguard-easy.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/docker-pi-hole-vs-wireguard-easy