# docker-pi-hole vs windmill

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | docker-pi-hole | windmill |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 41 in DNS | #6 of 32 in Workflow Automation |
| GitHub stars | 11 726 | 18 307 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +113 | +287 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 162 ✓ |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | v1.852.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Shell | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

docker-pi-hole and windmill score the same (77/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.

windmill ships more often: 162 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for docker-pi-hole.

If you want the quickest setup, docker-pi-hole is easier to run; windmill needs more configuration.

windmill is growing faster right now (+287 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [docker-pi-hole](https://selfhost.directory/project/docker-pi-hole) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/docker-pi-hole.md)
- [windmill](https://selfhost.directory/project/windmill) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windmill.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/docker-pi-hole-vs-windmill