docker-pi-holevswindmill
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| docker-pi-hole | windmill | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 41 in DNS | #6 of 32 in Workflow Automation |
| GitHub stars | 11 726 | 18 307 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +113 | +287 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 162 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | v1.852.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Shell | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
docker-pi-hole and windmill score the same (77/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.
windmill ships more often: 162 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for docker-pi-hole.
If you want the quickest setup, docker-pi-hole is easier to run; windmill needs more configuration.
windmill is growing faster right now (+287 stars in 30 days).
docker-pi-hole details →windmill details →
Swap a project
Keep docker-pi-hole, compare it with
Keep windmill, compare it with