docker-pi-holevsUwazi
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| docker-pi-hole | Uwazi | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 54/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 41 in DNS | #25 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 11 730 | 328 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +115 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 14 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | 1.229.284 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Shell | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
docker-pi-hole scores 77/100 against 54/100 for Uwazi, so it is the safer default.
Uwazi ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for docker-pi-hole.
If you want the quickest setup, docker-pi-hole is easier to run; Uwazi needs more configuration.
docker-pi-hole is growing faster right now (+115 stars in 30 days).
docker-pi-hole details →Uwazi details →
Swap a project
Keep docker-pi-hole, compare it with
Keep Uwazi, compare it with