docker-pi-holevsUniFi Docker Container
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| docker-pi-hole | UniFi Docker Container | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 53/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 41 in DNS | #15 of 34 in Network Management |
| GitHub stars | 11 726 | 323 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +113 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 10 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | 10.6.106 · 27 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
docker-pi-hole scores 77/100 against 53/100 for UniFi Docker Container, so it is the safer default.
docker-pi-hole ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for UniFi Docker Container.
If you want the quickest setup, docker-pi-hole is easier to run; UniFi Docker Container needs more configuration.
docker-pi-hole is growing faster right now (+113 stars in 30 days).
docker-pi-hole details →UniFi Docker Container details →
Swap a project
Keep docker-pi-hole, compare it with
Keep UniFi Docker Container, compare it with