# docker-pi-hole vs Umami

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | docker-pi-hole | Umami |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 85/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 41 in DNS | #1 of 21 in Web analytics |
| GitHub stars | 11 728 | 39 757 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +113 | +761 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 13 ✓ |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | v3.4.1 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Shell | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Umami scores 85/100 against 77/100 for docker-pi-hole, so it is the safer default.

Umami ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for docker-pi-hole.

Umami is growing faster right now (+761 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [docker-pi-hole](https://selfhost.directory/project/docker-pi-hole) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/docker-pi-hole.md)
- [Umami](https://selfhost.directory/project/umami) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/umami.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/docker-pi-hole-vs-umami