# docker-pi-hole vs TwitchDropsMiner

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | docker-pi-hole | TwitchDropsMiner |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 41 in DNS | #11 of 23 in Gaming |
| GitHub stars | 11 728 ✓ | 374 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +113 ✓ | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | v2.4.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Shell | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

docker-pi-hole scores 77/100 against 51/100 for TwitchDropsMiner, so it is the safer default.

TwitchDropsMiner ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for docker-pi-hole.

If you want the quickest setup, docker-pi-hole is easier to run; TwitchDropsMiner needs more configuration.

docker-pi-hole is growing faster right now (+113 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [docker-pi-hole](https://selfhost.directory/project/docker-pi-hole) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/docker-pi-hole.md)
- [TwitchDropsMiner](https://selfhost.directory/project/twitchdropsminer) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/twitchdropsminer.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/docker-pi-hole-vs-twitchdropsminer