docker-pi-holevsTrinity
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| docker-pi-hole | Trinity | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 41 in DNS | #60 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 11 728 | 713 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +113 | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 4 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | v1.0.0 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Python |
Which one should you pick?
docker-pi-hole scores 77/100 against 57/100 for Trinity, so it is the safer default.
docker-pi-hole ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for Trinity.
If you want the quickest setup, docker-pi-hole is easier to run; Trinity needs more configuration.
docker-pi-hole is growing faster right now (+113 stars in 30 days).
docker-pi-hole details →Trinity details →
Swap a project
Keep docker-pi-hole, compare it with
Keep Trinity, compare it with