# docker-pi-hole vs TradingAgents

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | docker-pi-hole | TradingAgents |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 41 in DNS | #4 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 11 727 | 117 816 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +114 | +5 457 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

TradingAgents scores 86/100 against 77/100 for docker-pi-hole, so it is the safer default.

docker-pi-hole ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.

If you want the quickest setup, docker-pi-hole is easier to run; TradingAgents needs more configuration.

TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 457 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [docker-pi-hole](https://selfhost.directory/project/docker-pi-hole) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/docker-pi-hole.md)
- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/docker-pi-hole-vs-tradingagents