docker-pi-holevsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| docker-pi-hole | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 41 in DNS | #4 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 11 727 | 117 816 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +114 | +5 457 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 11 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 86/100 against 77/100 for docker-pi-hole, so it is the safer default.
docker-pi-hole ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.
If you want the quickest setup, docker-pi-hole is easier to run; TradingAgents needs more configuration.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 457 stars in 30 days).
docker-pi-hole details →TradingAgents details →
Swap a project
Keep docker-pi-hole, compare it with
Keep TradingAgents, compare it with